<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Chinese Microentrepreneurs May Get Legal Licenses!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ironricebowl.org/2009/07/23/chinese-microentrepreneurs-may-get-legal-licenses/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ironricebowl.org/2009/07/23/chinese-microentrepreneurs-may-get-legal-licenses/</link>
	<description>Exploring Microfinance in China</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 14 May 2010 01:41:18 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Alex</title>
		<link>http://www.ironricebowl.org/2009/07/23/chinese-microentrepreneurs-may-get-legal-licenses/comment-page-1/#comment-15</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2009 06:58:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ironricebowl.org/?p=48#comment-15</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m interested that such non-tax-paying micro-enterprises have boomed over the past year, as I was under the impression many of them were the result of de-employment over the 90s and early 00s from large SOEs, with concessions made to newly unemployed workers that they needn&#039;t pay business taxes if they employed themselves?

As long as registration remains a choice, rather than a requirement, this sounds like an excellent policy initiative.

And the tax office will be happy with a new source of revenue/enforcement no doubt, given the plummeting receipts in H1 this year.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m interested that such non-tax-paying micro-enterprises have boomed over the past year, as I was under the impression many of them were the result of de-employment over the 90s and early 00s from large SOEs, with concessions made to newly unemployed workers that they needn&#8217;t pay business taxes if they employed themselves?</p>
<p>As long as registration remains a choice, rather than a requirement, this sounds like an excellent policy initiative.</p>
<p>And the tax office will be happy with a new source of revenue/enforcement no doubt, given the plummeting receipts in H1 this year.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
